2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.068502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to “Comment on ‘Quantum Raychaudhuri equation’”

Abstract: The above comment [1] claims that the paper "Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation" by S. Das, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 084068 has "problematic points" with regards to its derivation and implications. We show below that the above claim is incorrect, and that there are no problems with results of [2] or its implications.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact solutions of the field equations play a crucial role to discuss the composition of astrophysical objects. Das et al [29] presented different features of gravastar in f (R, T ) framework and evaluated a set of complete solutions for three different regions with their corresponding EoS. Shamir and Ahmad [30] solved the f (G, T ) field equations to obtain non-singular solutions of gravastar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exact solutions of the field equations play a crucial role to discuss the composition of astrophysical objects. Das et al [29] presented different features of gravastar in f (R, T ) framework and evaluated a set of complete solutions for three different regions with their corresponding EoS. Shamir and Ahmad [30] solved the f (G, T ) field equations to obtain non-singular solutions of gravastar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the values of these constants, we consider mass of the gravastar M = 3.75M ⊙ , inner radius R 1 = 10km and outer radius R 2 = 10.009km [44] which provide A = 0.01491932683km −2 , B = 0.2371387429 and C 2 = 186.8400519. The evolution of the metric potential (23) as well as the matter density and pressure ( 24) by inserting the above calculated values of unknowns are displayed in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. We see that the metric function does not possess any singularity and pressure or energy density exhibits positive values throughout the thin-shell of gravastar which sharply decrease with thickness of the shell.…”
Section: The Exterior Geometry and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interesting concept of the coupling between matter and geometry leads to different modified theories such as f (R, T ) gravity (Harko et al 2011), f (R, T, R γδ T γδ ) theory (Haghani et al 2013;Odintsov and Sáez-Gómes 2013) and f (G, T ) gravity (Sharif and Ikram 2016), where T exhibits the trace of energy-momentum tensor (EMT) and G stands for Gauss-Bonnet invariant. Among these modified theories, f (R, T ) gravity received much attention by several researchers in describing various astrophysical as well as cosmological scenarios with and without electric field (Houndjo 2012;Zubair 2012, 2013a, b;Farhoudi 2013, 2014;Sharif and Zubair 2014;Moraes 2015;Moraes et al 2016;Sharif and Siddiqa 2017;Das et al 2017;Sharif and Waseem 2018a, b;Deb et al 2018a, b;Siddiqa 2018, 2019;Sharif and Nawazish 2019;Sharif and Waseem 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the study of gravastar has attracted many people in modified theories of gravity. Das et al (2017) discussed the conjecture of gravastar in f (R, T ) framework and analyzed its physical characteristics graphically corresponding to different EoS. Shamir and Ahmad (2018) presented non-singular solutions of gravastar and evaluated mathematical expressions of various physical parameters in f (G, T ) scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%