Reply to comments by Overton, Emmett-Oglesby and Gauvin and Holloway

Barrett, Robert J.; Caul, William F.; Huffman, Esther M.; Smith, Robert N.

doi:10.1007/bf02245200

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Conditioned Taste Avoidance Drug Discrimination Procedure: Assessments and Applications

Riley

Clasen

Friar

2016

Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present chapter, we summarize much of the work on the taste avoidance drug discrimination procedure, presenting the logic for its initial introduction and the extension of the procedure in the investigation of the discriminative properties of various drugs. Results from these assessments parallel those from more traditional operant and maze designs in classifying and characterizing the discriminative properties of drug. At the same time, this design reveals a procedure that is sensitive in such assessments by indexing these stimulus properties more rapidly and at lower doses than in the more traditional procedures (in some cases for drugs heretofore resistant in their detection). Importantly, much remains to be learned about the taste avoidance procedure in that the nature of such learning remains unknown and the specific parameters under which it can be established and generalized and its neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases are largely unexplored. The application of drug discrimination learning to human drug abuse continues to be an important consideration for this specific design (as well as that of drug discrimination procedures in general), and recent parallels between drug use and food intake in terms of its regulation by interoceptive stimuli suggests a possible role of the loss of stimulus control in drug escalation and addiction (with possible therapeutic implications via the modulation of these interoceptive cues).

show abstract