2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Durkee: ‘Do the Maasai perceive weak walkers to be stronger and more attractive than strong walkers? A re-analysis of Fink et al . (2019)’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Desperate) × 2 (Target Strength: Strong vs. Weak) mixed-models ANOVAs with repeated factors over the latter factor. Such an analytic strategy yields similar results with these stimuli as ostensibly more conservative analyses, albeit with greater ease of interpretation (Brown et al, 2023;Fink et al, 2019). Our outcomes were: perceptions of targets as effective fathers, disciplinarians, and as community leaders; perceptions of targets as willing to use more constructive forms of discipline; and perceptions of men as affording safety for their family.…”
Section: Primary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Desperate) × 2 (Target Strength: Strong vs. Weak) mixed-models ANOVAs with repeated factors over the latter factor. Such an analytic strategy yields similar results with these stimuli as ostensibly more conservative analyses, albeit with greater ease of interpretation (Brown et al, 2023;Fink et al, 2019). Our outcomes were: perceptions of targets as effective fathers, disciplinarians, and as community leaders; perceptions of targets as willing to use more constructive forms of discipline; and perceptions of men as affording safety for their family.…”
Section: Primary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Given (a) the complexity of the analysis that could inflate the type I error rate, (b) predictions based around interactions, and (c) difficult interpreting main effects in this model, I reported the interactive effects in this analysis exclusively. My use of an ANOVA additionally afforded me the opportunity to interpret these effects more exhaustively compared to other ostensibly more conservative analyses (see Fink et al, 2019). Because I violated the assumption of sphericity, I have adjusted my omnibus degrees of freedom with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of this analysis led me to report only interactive effects to reduce the likelihood of Type I Errors. This analytic strategy additionally affords more conservative analyses (see Fink et al, 2019). Table 2 provides relevant descriptive statistics.…”
Section: Wrestling Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%