2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2020.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to: “Letter: Two cases of persistent falcine and occipital sinuses”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, differences in the identification rate among imaging modalities have become an issue for the occipital sinuses. The identification rate of the occipital sinus has been reported to be 93.4% in adult cadavers, 8.6% in CT digital subtraction venography, and 10% in magnetic resonance venography [3,4]. Although the exact reason for the difference in the identification rate among cadavers and imaging modalities may be unknown, it would be important for neurosurgeons and radiologists to know the identification rate of venous sinuses in imaging modalities, including DSA and 3D CE-T1WI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, differences in the identification rate among imaging modalities have become an issue for the occipital sinuses. The identification rate of the occipital sinus has been reported to be 93.4% in adult cadavers, 8.6% in CT digital subtraction venography, and 10% in magnetic resonance venography [3,4]. Although the exact reason for the difference in the identification rate among cadavers and imaging modalities may be unknown, it would be important for neurosurgeons and radiologists to know the identification rate of venous sinuses in imaging modalities, including DSA and 3D CE-T1WI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%