2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018077117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Pisupati et al.: Evaluating single subunit counting data to find the correct stoichiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this salt bridge is important in the tetramer as well as the pentamer that we see here, it would imply that the stoichiometry of Kv2: KvS proteins would be most stable in a 2:2 arrangement. Both 2:2 and 3:1 stoichiometries for Kv2: KvS proteins have been observed in transfected cell models but which state predominates in native channels is unknown [35][36][37][38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this salt bridge is important in the tetramer as well as the pentamer that we see here, it would imply that the stoichiometry of Kv2: KvS proteins would be most stable in a 2:2 arrangement. Both 2:2 and 3:1 stoichiometries for Kv2: KvS proteins have been observed in transfected cell models but which state predominates in native channels is unknown [35][36][37][38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%