2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.06148
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to the Comments on the 12C+12C fusion S^*-factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These indirect data show a very steep rise of the 12 C+ 12 C astrophysical factor with decreasing energy, where the resonant peak at around 0.9 MeV is larger than the empirical S factor extrapolated by Fowler et al [4] by a factor of several thousands. Such a huge jump of the 12 C+ 12 C astrophysical S factor below the Gamow energy sparked off a strong debate on the use of the THM in this case [66,67]. Moreover, the existing extrapolated reactions can proceed through different configurations of 24 Mg , and it is quite complicated to take all these reaction channels into account properly in the coupled reaction channel calculation.…”
Section: Results Of the Om Analysis And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These indirect data show a very steep rise of the 12 C+ 12 C astrophysical factor with decreasing energy, where the resonant peak at around 0.9 MeV is larger than the empirical S factor extrapolated by Fowler et al [4] by a factor of several thousands. Such a huge jump of the 12 C+ 12 C astrophysical S factor below the Gamow energy sparked off a strong debate on the use of the THM in this case [66,67]. Moreover, the existing extrapolated reactions can proceed through different configurations of 24 Mg , and it is quite complicated to take all these reaction channels into account properly in the coupled reaction channel calculation.…”
Section: Results Of the Om Analysis And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 together with the phenomenological S factor suggested by Fowler et al [4], based on the "black body" model using a phenomenological nuclear potential with parameters adjusted by the best BPM fit to the data of the direct measurements of 12 C+ 12 C fusion. Because of the ongoing debate on the THM [66,67] and the resulting uncertainty of recent data [25] from indirect measurement of 12 C+ 12 C fusion, these data were not included in the present discussion. One can see in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of the Om Analysis And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(a). There is an on-going debate [32][33][34] about how to extrapolate the THM measurements down to the stellar energies. Both accurate direct measurements at energies below E c.m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These DCSs increase when the scattering angle of the deuterons increases. It also demonstrates that the statement in [6] that the deuterons cannot be emitted to backward angles is not correct. • In Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that the resonance energies, which can be observed in the THM experiment, are E < 3.56 MeV, because at E > 3.56 MeV, the resonance energy in the p + 23 Na channel is 3.56 + Q 2 > 5.8 MeV, that is, the d − 24 Mg relative kinetic energy is E d− 24 Mg < 0. That is why the extrapolation of the S * (E)-factor beyond this energy, as it is done in [6], is difficult to justify.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%