2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1600618113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Wang et al.: Sequencing datasets do not refute Central Asian domestication origin of dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These LD patterns were called into question by an analysis that added LD data from East Asian village dogs based upon whole-genome sequencing, which found they had lower LD than Central Asian village dogs (50). However, this finding was attributed to negative bias in LD estimates arising from the low-coverage nature of these genome sequences (51).…”
Section: Regional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These LD patterns were called into question by an analysis that added LD data from East Asian village dogs based upon whole-genome sequencing, which found they had lower LD than Central Asian village dogs (50). However, this finding was attributed to negative bias in LD estimates arising from the low-coverage nature of these genome sequences (51).…”
Section: Regional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, there is substantial geographic structure in Chinese wolves, which can add to diversity of dogs that are geographically overlapping with them (15,20). Admixture from Asian wolves into dogs would elevate metrics of genetic diversity in ways that do not reflect their genetic ancestry and may be a problem for studies that do not use explicit demographic models that account for admixture (e.g., 48,51).…”
Section: The Admixture Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation