2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13278-016-0334-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply trees in Twitter: data analysis and branching process models

Abstract: Structure of networks constructed from mentioning relationships between posts in online media may be valuable for understanding how information and opinions spread in these media. We crawled Twitter to collect tweets and replies to construct a large number of so-called reply trees, each of which was rooted at a tweet and joined by replies. Consistent with the previous literature, we found that the empirical trees were characterized by some long path-like reply trees, large star-like trees, and long irregular t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of so-called 'reply trees' was also studied by Nishi et. al in [21], where authors proposed simple principles for the formation of such trees. It is important to stress that the mechanisms behind retweet cascades and reply trees on one side, and discussion trees on the other side, are intrinsically different, due to the different designs of their platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of so-called 'reply trees' was also studied by Nishi et. al in [21], where authors proposed simple principles for the formation of such trees. It is important to stress that the mechanisms behind retweet cascades and reply trees on one side, and discussion trees on the other side, are intrinsically different, due to the different designs of their platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Kumar et al [83] • Wang et al [84], • Gómez et al [85] • Backstrom et al [86] • Nishi et al [87] • Lumbreras [88] • Aragón et al [89] The selection of these models is based on the consideration of Kumar et al [83] as the first generative model for online discussion threads. The rest of the models in the survey were selected after examining the publications citing this work in Scopus (52 papers) and Google Scholar (92 papers) 2 , and including the studies which proposed a generative model for the structure and growth of online discussion threads.…”
Section: Survey On Generative Models Of Online Discussion Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to model network structure and information diffusion simultaneously without using time as a dimension. Both Li et al (2012) and Nishi et al (2016) use a Galton-Watson branching process model, for data of video contents shared on online social networks, and reply trees in Twitter, respectively.…”
Section: Topological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%