2015
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798s14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the 2014-2015 AACP Standing Committee on Advocacy: Access, Affordability and Accountability: Academic Pharmacy’s Approaches and Challenges in Addressing Issues of Higher Education Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1 Educational policy: the principles of access, quality and accountability Access, quality and accountability are key principles for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of educational policies (Jenkins and Rodríguez, 2013). For Heller (2001), including affordability, guaranteeing these principles is the biggest challenge that higher education needs to face and deserves the full attention of public policies (Mangione et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1 Educational policy: the principles of access, quality and accountability Access, quality and accountability are key principles for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of educational policies (Jenkins and Rodríguez, 2013). For Heller (2001), including affordability, guaranteeing these principles is the biggest challenge that higher education needs to face and deserves the full attention of public policies (Mangione et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programs will also have to consider the challenges students face when accessing education and completing pre-requisite coursework at community colleges and less prestigious institutions, as many students are also faced with trying to balance taking care of the basic needs of their family as they address competing priorities of work and school. 8 Students may have one or more characteristics associated with lower levels of academic preparedness including pre-requisite institution, GPAs (including cumulative and course specific), degree completion status, and standardized test scores. 9 Other markers may be related to background, including socioeconomic status, first generation college student (or professional student), rural location, and English as a second language.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%