2002
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-52-3-1043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology.

Abstract: An ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology met in Gent, Belgium, in February 2002. The committee made various recommendations regarding the species definition in the light of developments in methodologies available to systematists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

30
599
1
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 676 publications
(660 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
30
599
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 800 bp of sequence was obtained per amplicon; these were compared with those deposited in the GenBank database, using the online BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) and with those in the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp). Sequences sharing a percentage of identity of 97% or higher to those in databases were considered to belong to the same species (Stackebrandt et al 2002).…”
Section: Phenotypic Identification Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 800 bp of sequence was obtained per amplicon; these were compared with those deposited in the GenBank database, using the online BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) and with those in the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp). Sequences sharing a percentage of identity of 97% or higher to those in databases were considered to belong to the same species (Stackebrandt et al 2002).…”
Section: Phenotypic Identification Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the recommendations of the "Ad Hoc Committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology" (Stackebrand et al 2002), the name of this as yet uncultured organism should be "Candidatus Treponema paraluisleporis", pending further characterization (Euzéby 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reclassification of Enterobacter sakazakii to Cronobacter was based on a polyphasic approach that included DNA-DNA hybridisation, amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP), automated ribotyping, full length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phenotypic analysis 22,34 . A total of 210 strains, previously described as Enterobacter sakazakii were divided into 16 biogroups based on indole production, methyl red test, Voges-Proskauer, ornithine decarboxylase, motility, malonate utilisation and acid production from inositol, dulcitol and methylglucoside.…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a high level of similarity between C. sakazakii and C. malonaticus and sequence analysis based on 16S rRNA is not sufficient to distinguish between these two species 22,31,33 . Biochemical differentiation between the two species can be accomplished by testing for the utilisation of malonate, although a small number of C. sakazakii strains do utilize malonate 34 . Controversial results regarding these two species have been found when the phenotypic data of 150 isolates was compared to ribotyping results 36 .…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%