1996
DOI: 10.1250/ast.17.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the Committee of the Social Survey on Noise Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were, (1) satisfaction with the environment, (2) audibility and annoyance of various sounds in the environment, (3) most annoying sound source, (4) opinions concerning auditory warning signals, (5) habituation to noise, and (6) face sheet. Q1 to Q3 are the items proposed by the committee of the Acoustical Society of Japan [4,5].…”
Section: Questionnaire Survey 21 Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were, (1) satisfaction with the environment, (2) audibility and annoyance of various sounds in the environment, (3) most annoying sound source, (4) opinions concerning auditory warning signals, (5) habituation to noise, and (6) face sheet. Q1 to Q3 are the items proposed by the committee of the Acoustical Society of Japan [4,5].…”
Section: Questionnaire Survey 21 Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Committee proposed fundamental items for a questionnaire that can be used commonly in social surveys in Japanese in 1992 [1] after preliminary surveys conducted in seven research organizations which the committee members belonged to. The English version of the questionnaire was published in 1996 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by physical measurement, and there have been several studies characterizing the acoustic conditions of different cities, with analyses of one or more facets of the problem, such as the sources of noise, and noise contamination levels [1][2][3][4][5]. Secondly, psychological and social aspects, which generally consist of surveys of a significant sample of the affected population [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%