1992
DOI: 10.1136/tc.1.suppl1.s45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the Tobacco Policy Research Study Group on Access to Tobacco Products in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is dif cult, however, to synthesize and compare the results of the many studies because they differ considerably in terms of the age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status of the participants as well as location, culture, setting, and measurement. Nonetheless, common in uences on and reasons for smoking initiation and maintenance have been identi ed, including parental (Flay et al, 1994;Grif n, Botvin, Doyle, Diaz, & Epstein, 1999;Stanton & Silva, 1991), peer (AloiseYoung, Graham, & Hansen, 1994;Flay et al, 1994;Skinner & Krohn, 1992;Sussman, Dent, Flay, Hansen, & Johnson, 1987;Urberg, 1992) and sibling smoking (Murray, Kiryluk, & Swan, 1985;Stanton & Silva, 1991), access to and availability of cigarettes (Altman et al, 1992;Jason, Ji, Anes, & Birkhead, 1991), socioeconomic status (Blane, Hart, Davey-Smith, Gillis, Hole, & Hawthorne, 1996;Graham & Der, 1999), personal characteristics such as rebelliousness (Best, Brown, Cameron, Manske, & Santi, 1995;Santi, Cargo, Brown, Best, & Cameron, 1996), low expectations for academic success (Chassin, Presson, Sherman, Corty, & Olshavsky, 1984), social bonding and relief from social anxiety (Crisp, Sedgwick, Halek, Joughlin, & Humphrey, 1999), weight management (Crisp et al, 1998) and socioeconomic factors (Amos, 1996;Graham & Der, 1999).…”
Section: Explanations Of Smoking Initiation and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is dif cult, however, to synthesize and compare the results of the many studies because they differ considerably in terms of the age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status of the participants as well as location, culture, setting, and measurement. Nonetheless, common in uences on and reasons for smoking initiation and maintenance have been identi ed, including parental (Flay et al, 1994;Grif n, Botvin, Doyle, Diaz, & Epstein, 1999;Stanton & Silva, 1991), peer (AloiseYoung, Graham, & Hansen, 1994;Flay et al, 1994;Skinner & Krohn, 1992;Sussman, Dent, Flay, Hansen, & Johnson, 1987;Urberg, 1992) and sibling smoking (Murray, Kiryluk, & Swan, 1985;Stanton & Silva, 1991), access to and availability of cigarettes (Altman et al, 1992;Jason, Ji, Anes, & Birkhead, 1991), socioeconomic status (Blane, Hart, Davey-Smith, Gillis, Hole, & Hawthorne, 1996;Graham & Der, 1999), personal characteristics such as rebelliousness (Best, Brown, Cameron, Manske, & Santi, 1995;Santi, Cargo, Brown, Best, & Cameron, 1996), low expectations for academic success (Chassin, Presson, Sherman, Corty, & Olshavsky, 1984), social bonding and relief from social anxiety (Crisp, Sedgwick, Halek, Joughlin, & Humphrey, 1999), weight management (Crisp et al, 1998) and socioeconomic factors (Amos, 1996;Graham & Der, 1999).…”
Section: Explanations Of Smoking Initiation and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although compliance checks of retail outlets are generally considered a crucial element of programs to prevent tobacco sales to minors, few studies of such programs have been done. 8 The study involved monitoring tobacco sales to minors in all tobacco-selling retail outlets in 6 pairs of communities in Erie County, New York, between September 1994 and November 1995. Communities were matched on the basis of the socioeconomic characteristics of the population and number of tobacco-selling retail outlets.…”
Section: Introduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given Minnesota's leadership role in tobacco policy over the past 20 years, these rates are likely to exceed rates in many other states. Enforcement efforts in Woodridge, Illinois, (76) are well known, and have diffused to a number of other communities (2). A community organizing effort in seven Minnesota communities succeeded in increasing youth access enforcement efforts (as well as passing ordinances) (10, 55).…”
Section: Enforcement Of Youth Access Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%