The number of publications applying nonlinear mixed-effect (NLME) modeling has increased yearly since its first appearance in 1979. Here, we evaluated articles that have used NLME modeling, were published in journals that attract a broader audience, and we discussed the standard of presentation of these to stimulate target audience-specific improvements for increased impact in the future.
MOTIVATIONPharmacometrics aims to describe the quantitative aspects of disease and pharmacology dynamics, to understand drug-patient-disease interaction by connecting various fields, such as physiology, pharmacology, clinical pharmacy, mathematical modeling, statistics, systems biology, pharmacokinetics/-dynamics in a coherent framework to generate knowledge, and improve drug development and patient outcomes (www.pharm etrx.de). The mathematical nature of the models used is not easily translatable to scientists outside the pharmacometric community, we, therefore, need to endeavor to improve communication within multidisciplinary teams and convey results to clinicians, editors, other modelers, reviewers, regulators, pharmacists, healthcare decision makers, and statisticians in a translational manner for having impact on scientific advancement and drug-based decisions.The aims of this study were to identify (i) publications that have applied nonlinear mixed-effect (NLME) modeling since its first appearance in 1979, (ii) identify and evaluate the ones published in high impact journals, and (iii) to evaluate to which degree these were published in line with reporting standards for NLME analyses, 1-3 which are in line with the recently updated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guideline (https://www.fda.gov/media/ 12879 3/download).