2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adherence to wearing activity trackers was high, suggesting these devices are feasible and acceptable to participants. However, there was no standardized method for reporting wearable activity tracker outcomes, including adherence, validity, and physical activity measures [ 50 ]. The heterogeneous reporting of methods and results among studies using wearable physical activity trackers makes it difficult to compare findings across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to wearing activity trackers was high, suggesting these devices are feasible and acceptable to participants. However, there was no standardized method for reporting wearable activity tracker outcomes, including adherence, validity, and physical activity measures [ 50 ]. The heterogeneous reporting of methods and results among studies using wearable physical activity trackers makes it difficult to compare findings across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed several steps to ensure the quality and completeness of data before initiating the clinical trial. It is essential that you take these steps to ensure that you can report adherence and physical activity measures at the conclusion of your study ( 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring baseline motivation has been common practice, but Sperandei’s results indicated that the potential changes in motivation during intervention could be highly significant, and that looking at motivation alone does not seem sufficient to promote adherence [ 12 ]. As far as technology is concerned, we now know that app glitches are able to profoundly influence app adherence in a negative manner [ 8 ], yet researchers seem to be lacking a consensus of conceptualization for adherence [ 7 , 8 , 12 , 25 ] and other related terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, fitness trackers, pedometers and accelerometers have become popular instruments for obtaining reliable estimates of PA [ 26 ]. Some of these technologies, alone or in combination with others, allow researchers to measure not only wear duration and step count, but also other relevant factors related to exercise, such as activity intensity and energy expenditure [ 25 ]. Even for activity tracking publications, heterogeneity in the analyses and reporting of data has been observed—and authors have recommended that minimum reporting thresholds be determined in the future [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%