2015
DOI: 10.1002/jcad.12039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting Results of Single‐Case Studies

Abstract: This article provides an overview of reporting and presenting single‐case study results. The authors offer practical tips for sharing outcomes of studies, reporting visual inspection measures, conducting common statistical procedures, and disseminating results to stakeholders. Specific implications for counselors are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All results are presented; excerpts are discussed in detail. Hott et al (2015) advocate that single cases studies should provide a multitude of information that allows the reader to draw his/her own interpretations about the treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All results are presented; excerpts are discussed in detail. Hott et al (2015) advocate that single cases studies should provide a multitude of information that allows the reader to draw his/her own interpretations about the treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the implications of the various sources of information on treatment, it is relevant to investigate the perceptions of multiple informers about the effects of psychotherapy. The research and systematic publication of these perceptions are vital to establishing evidence-based treatments, taking into account the growing academic and social demand for clinicians to conduct research that informs their practice (Hott et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior to be observed has to be operatively defined providing examples and counterexamples of human actions that will or will not be counted as instances of the target behavior. IOA has to be assessed for at least 20% of the observational sessions and the exact quantification depends on the observational procedure followed (Hott, Limberg, Ohrt, & Schmit, 2015). IOA has to be reported both as an average and a range and the authors should be aware of the minimal standards: 80% percentage agreement and 60% Cohen's kappa (Horner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methods ---Instrument: the Dependent Variable Describedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline data are instrumental in establishing measurable goals, and visual analysis is both an efficient and effective method for monitoring response to treatment. Indeed, behavioral interventions, once in place, should be continually monitored for effectiveness, and the most pragmatic way for doing this is via visual inspection of data (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, ), assessing target‐client responsiveness when a treatment is introduced (see Holt, Limberg, Ohrt, & Schmit, ; Kennedy, ; Kratochwill et al., ; Kratochwill, Levin, Horner, & Swoboda, , for review).…”
Section: Best Practices In Psychological Report Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information presented within this substage is the most amenable to graphical displays. Frequency data collected by classroom staff, interval observation data, and functional analysis data can be arranged in line or bar graphs and can later be used to make treatment decisions (see Holt et al., ). Daily data and interval observation data can be used as baseline data that, when combined with data collected during intervention, can be used to monitor treatment effects.…”
Section: Toward Best Practices For Fba Report Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%