2006
DOI: 10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

61
3,736
3
227

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,269 publications
(4,027 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
61
3,736
3
227
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the v 2 was less than two times the model's degrees of freedom, which roughly indicates a good model fit (Tabachnick and Fidell 2006). The goodness-of-fit indices (Schreiber et al 2006) also indicated a good model fit (the normed fit index, incremental fit index, Tucker-Lewis index and comparative fit index were greater than 0.95 and the root mean square error of approximation was less than 0.06).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the v 2 was less than two times the model's degrees of freedom, which roughly indicates a good model fit (Tabachnick and Fidell 2006). The goodness-of-fit indices (Schreiber et al 2006) also indicated a good model fit (the normed fit index, incremental fit index, Tucker-Lewis index and comparative fit index were greater than 0.95 and the root mean square error of approximation was less than 0.06).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The evidence from the fit indices was mixed. The CFI (0.853) and TLI (0.836) were below the cut-off of 0.9, but the RMSEA (0.050 90% CI [0.045, 0.055]) was less than the cut-off value of 0.06 (Hu & Bentler, 1999;Schreiber et al, 2006).…”
Section: Baseline Model Fitmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Model fit was assessed using multiple fit indices including the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and the Root Mean SquareError of Approximation (RMSEA). Suggested cut-off criteria from Hu and Bentler (1999) and Schreiber, Stage, King, Nora and Barlow (2006) were consulted used to help interpret the fit of the model. However, with complex models, fit statistics are often overly sensitive to small, theoretically insignificant lack of fit (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002).…”
Section: Sem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-significant chi-square values (p > 0.05) indicate the model fits the data relatively well. We also used a multiple additional indicators of model fits, including: Comparative Fit Index–CFI (values > 0.95 indicate good model fits); root mean square error–RMSE (values < 0.06 indicate good model fits); and weighted root mean square residual–WRMR (values < 0.90 indicate good model fits) [8083]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%