International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research 2014
DOI: 10.4337/9781781006795.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting versus inaction: How much is there, what explains the differences and what to measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A contrasting finding here, however, is how the interview subjects in this study, while displaying lacking notification knowledge, simultaneously identified several perceived arenas for notification, e.g., their immediate supervisor, the Human Resource Director and their Labor Union representative. Traditionally that symbolizes an open, transparent and including workplace environment [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contrasting finding here, however, is how the interview subjects in this study, while displaying lacking notification knowledge, simultaneously identified several perceived arenas for notification, e.g., their immediate supervisor, the Human Resource Director and their Labor Union representative. Traditionally that symbolizes an open, transparent and including workplace environment [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed this scenario to capture the essence of each construct. A hypothetical scenario is the most common form of whistleblowing survey research, and explains customers’ self-reported actions in response to observed wrongdoing in certain situations (Olsen 2014 ). A hypothetical scenario approach was chosen because it is difficult to directly measure observation of wrongdoing in the workplace.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing sovereign-level whistleblowing scholarship includes the role of impartiality, the importance of concept clarity (Lewis, Brown, & Moberly, 2014; Vandekerckhove, Brown, & Tsahuridu, 2014), and how whistleblowing policies affect outcomes (Olsen, 2014; Peffer et al, 2015). Scholars have discussed how anti-reprisal rules may discourage retaliation (Miceli & Near, 2013; Miceli, Near, & Dworkin, 2008; Near & Miceli, 2008; Smith, 2014) and how judicial mechanisms influence employee protection (Kohn, 2011).…”
Section: Background Literature Descriptive Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%