1995
DOI: 10.1016/0895-7177(95)00187-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation and analysis of behavior for multiprocess systems by using stochastic Petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a bipartite directed graph, Petri nets help to represent the structure of the system precisely. This graphical representation provides an inherently visual model to represent and understand the behavior of complex systems easily (Jin and Sugawa, 1995).…”
Section: Modeling Techniques For Reliability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a bipartite directed graph, Petri nets help to represent the structure of the system precisely. This graphical representation provides an inherently visual model to represent and understand the behavior of complex systems easily (Jin and Sugawa, 1995).…”
Section: Modeling Techniques For Reliability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…} } (19) According to (16) and (19), the fuzzy z L -transform of the discrete-state discrete-time fuzzy stochastic process  ( ) G k can be written as: The dynamic fuzzy availability of the entire DTRMSS for the fuzzy consumer demand ω  at time ( ) 0,1, k k =  is defined as:…”
Section: Fuzzy Dynamic Availability Assessment For Dtrmssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are Monte Carlo simulation [41,42], stochastic Petri nets [19,21], universal generating function [24,32], Markov models [6,37] and the combinations of the above methods [9]. However, conventional availability analysis methods for repairable multi-state systems are based on the continuous time models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTA and PN methodology are generally used for failure analysis of these systems (Singer, 1990;Soman and Misra, 1993;Jin and Sugawa, 1995;Adamayan and He, 2004). But both of the analyses need precise knowledge of components' functional dependencies of the system and probabilities of occurrence of basic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For failure analysis various methods available in literature are Reliability block diagrams (RBD's), Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), Markov modeling (MM), Failure mode effective analysis (FMEA), Root cause analysis (RCA), Fault tree analysis (FTA) and Petri‐nets (PN) etc. FTA and PN methodology are generally used for failure analysis of these systems (Singer, 1990; Soman and Misra, 1993; Jin and Sugawa, 1995; Adamayan and He, 2004). But both of the analyses need precise knowledge of components' functional dependencies of the system and probabilities of occurrence of basic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%