2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of facial expression categories in continuous arousal–valence space: Feature and correlation

Abstract: Representation of facial expressions using continuous dimensions has shown to be inherently more expressive and psychologically meaningful than using categorized emotions, and thus has gained increasing attention over recent years. Many sub-problems have arisen in this new field that remain only partially understood. A comparison of the regression performance of different texture and geometric features and the investigation of the correlations between continuous dimensional axes and basic categorized emotions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches primarily generate the mapping between audio-visual features and each affective dimension separately, and thus the intrinsic correlations between affective dimensions are largely ignored. As previous studies [7] and our previous work [14] showed that there often exist strong correlations between discrete affective categories and affective dimensions, as well as between affective dimensions, it is desirable to exploit the usefulness of the correlations between affective dimensions in improving the prediction accuracy of AVCA. The incorporation of such correlations is also anticipated to be an effective way to reduce the affective gap [2], which is caused by the lack of coincidence between the measurable features and the expected affective states of the viewer.…”
Section: B Avca Approaches Using Affective Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These approaches primarily generate the mapping between audio-visual features and each affective dimension separately, and thus the intrinsic correlations between affective dimensions are largely ignored. As previous studies [7] and our previous work [14] showed that there often exist strong correlations between discrete affective categories and affective dimensions, as well as between affective dimensions, it is desirable to exploit the usefulness of the correlations between affective dimensions in improving the prediction accuracy of AVCA. The incorporation of such correlations is also anticipated to be an effective way to reduce the affective gap [2], which is caused by the lack of coincidence between the measurable features and the expected affective states of the viewer.…”
Section: B Avca Approaches Using Affective Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The speech emotion recognition study [39] illustrates six categories of human vocal emotions. Among various facial emotion studies, [5,68] represent the facial expressions with seven categories in two-dimensional valencearousal space. A three-dimensional model for eight basic facial emotions and monoamine neurotransmitters is represented in [33] using the corners of a cube.…”
Section: Music Video Emotion Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensional spaces have the advantage of representing a wide range of emotions, and can provide unique insights into the relationship between emotions and emotional intensity. It should be noted that most existing approaches to emotion recognition in dimensional spaces quantize the dimensions into a number of intervals, such as the four quadrants [23], or negative and positive emotions [24], and only few studies [25] have investigated continuous dimensions. This paper adopts three emotion categories of positive, neutral and negative for the classification experiments, catering for the aim for practical applications where facial expressions are more complicated than pre-defined emotions.…”
Section: Facial Expression Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the size of 8×10 is used for LBP feature extraction in the proposed system. [34,35,39,45,48,41,40,46,49,26] and [34,40,48,39,41,45,49,25,35,46], respectively. It is interesting to observe that the two databases share 9 out of the top 10 points (indices: [34,35,39,45,48,41,40,46,49]).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%