1975
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of head and face in postcentral gyrus of the macaque

Abstract: The receptive field and submodality characteristics of individual neurons within the cytoarchitectural and topographic subdivisions of the head and face areas of the postcentral gyrus (SI) were determined with the technique of extracellular recording. Correlation of the single-unit data with the intracortical location of the recording electrode provided a detailed description of the functional organization within each of the several cytoarchitecturally distinct regions contributing to the representation of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
42
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In area 3b, the overt hand representation thus far appears to be exclusively contralateral, despite the fact that it can be modulated by stimulation of the ipsilateral hand (Calford and Tweedale, 1990). In this regard, the hand representation in primate area 3b contrasts strongly with that in carnivores (Towe et al, 1964) and rodents (Shin et al, 1997), as well as with the primary cortical representations of the face, oral cavity (Dreyer et al, 1975;Manger et al, 1996;Jain et al, 2001;Disbrow et al, 2003), and midline trunk ) that commonly incorporate and/or cross the midline. These physiological findings mirror known anatomical constraints, because the hand representation in area 3b appears to lack direct thalamic inputs driven by the ipsilateral hand and has few callosal connections (Jones and Hendry, 1980;Killackey et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In area 3b, the overt hand representation thus far appears to be exclusively contralateral, despite the fact that it can be modulated by stimulation of the ipsilateral hand (Calford and Tweedale, 1990). In this regard, the hand representation in primate area 3b contrasts strongly with that in carnivores (Towe et al, 1964) and rodents (Shin et al, 1997), as well as with the primary cortical representations of the face, oral cavity (Dreyer et al, 1975;Manger et al, 1996;Jain et al, 2001;Disbrow et al, 2003), and midline trunk ) that commonly incorporate and/or cross the midline. These physiological findings mirror known anatomical constraints, because the hand representation in area 3b appears to lack direct thalamic inputs driven by the ipsilateral hand and has few callosal connections (Jones and Hendry, 1980;Killackey et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two widely separated stimuli activate different populations of cortical neurons, and it has been suggested that percepts of apparent motion may arise from higher order central neural mechanisms that are sensitive to the rate at which and to the direction in which the activity shifts across the primary somatosensory cortex in response to their successive delivery (Costanzo & Gardner, 1980;Sherrick & Rogers, 1966). In the present study, it is likely that two stimuli separated by even the maximum separation fell within the RFs of many somatosensory cortical neurons (see Dreyer, Loe, Metz, & Whitsel, 1975). Thus, the central neural basis for percepts ofsmooth apparent motion evoked by the successive activation of two discrete stimuli remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In addition, at least in area 3b, such convergence is considered to be rare, because of the presence of the hand-face border. An earlier study of the vSI reported that several neurons in areas 3b or 1 had discrete RFs on both the radial hand and the lateral part of the face [37]. Since those neurons had face RFs that were remote from the oral slit, they are unlikely to relate to feeding behavior.…”
Section: Hand-mouth Motor Coordination In Self-feeding Behaviormentioning
confidence: 97%