1994
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90366-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of hedonics and quality of taste stimuli in the parabrachial nucleus of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

17
113
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
17
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PBN is suggested to be involved in the acquisition of CTA (14,22,34). The present results showed that the loss of Fosmediated signaling in the PBN during the conditioning weakened the acquisition of CTA, resulting in the attenuated retention of CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PBN is suggested to be involved in the acquisition of CTA (14,22,34). The present results showed that the loss of Fosmediated signaling in the PBN during the conditioning weakened the acquisition of CTA, resulting in the attenuated retention of CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Neurons in the PBN, the second-order gustatory relay station in the rat central gustatory pathway, are known to induce c-fos expression in response to gustatory and visceral stimuli (16,22,23,31,32). The present study showed that PBN neuronal responses at least at the early phase (15 s) of taste stimulation were not altered after the acute blockage of c-fos mRNA translation (Fos protein synthesis) by AS-ODN within the PBN, and that the same treatment did not affect the expression of LiCl-induced Fos-li-positive cells in the CeA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training involving peripheral stimulation usually modifies the relative representation in primate auditory cortex (5) or in somatosensory cortices of both humans (23), nonhuman primates (24), and rodents (4,25). However, unlike the above cited studies, in our experiments maps rearrangement is caused not by a modification in the stimulus-receptor interaction at the periphery (the bottom-up inputs) but rather by viscero-gustatory interaction that might occur from top-down modulations in early brainstem relays, such as the nucleus of solitary tract (26,27), the parabrachial nucleus (28,29), or CTA-related forebrain centers, such as basolateral amygdala (10) and primary GC (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In a series of studies using c-FLI expression, Yamamoto et al (29) conditioned rats to saccharin aversion and individuated subnuclei in the parabrachial nucleus responding only to the hedonic value of the stimulus, with other regions responding to the pure taste modality. Despite the evidence that hedonic value might be determined in the brainstem, altogether the imaging and electrophysiological approaches demonstrate that the GC distinguishes between positive and negative hedonics, although it does not seem to possess an area exclusively dedicated to this processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%