1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03203522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of on-line questionnaires in an editable, auditable database

Abstract: A general way of describing multiple-choice questionnaires for on-line presentation is described. Some of the important features supported include random ordering of and sampling among questions, substitution of specific-question text into boilerplate question and response formats, a limited ability to bypass irrelevant questions, experimenter editing of response arrays, and automatic production of hard-copy versions of the questionnaire for use during computer breakdowns and for archival documentation. All ed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During testing, the subject is presented with the image of an airplane, controlled by the subject with a joystick, and a randomly curving road. As the road moves down the screen, the subject is tasked to position the image of the airplane over the center of the road and to press a button on the joystick in response to randomly appearing targets 13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During testing, the subject is presented with the image of an airplane, controlled by the subject with a joystick, and a randomly curving road. As the road moves down the screen, the subject is tasked to position the image of the airplane over the center of the road and to press a button on the joystick in response to randomly appearing targets 13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the road moves down the screen, the subject is tasked to position the image of the airplane over the center of the road and to press a button on the joystick in response to randomly appearing targets. 13 Divided attention test assessments included the percentage of target hits, with lower scores indicating greater impairment; the percentage of time over the road, with lower percentages indicating greater impairment; and the number of false alarms with the subject pressing the button when no target has appeared, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Root mean square (RMS) distance from the center of the road (pixels) was assessed, with longer distances indicating greater impairment.…”
Section: Cognitive Performance Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%