2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2093401/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Groups in Preventive Intervention Research

Abstract: Objective. Because racial and ethnic minoritized groups disproportionately represented essential workers and lacked equitable access to resources that mitigated exposure and mortality risk, the COVID-19 pandemic brought disparities to the forefront of public health, exacerbating existing discrepancies. These inequities highlight a pressing need for the prevention science field to investigate whether interventions promote equitable well-being, which served as the impetus for this study. We examined 885 programs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group prioritizes impact, pragmatism, and external validity, after being in settings with patients, clinicians, organizational leaders, community members, and policymakers too many times to count where internal validity was prioritized at the expense of producing viable interventions to deploy in contexts where care is delivered. Our lens highlights the implications of a long tradition of overvaluing, through the investment in research, discovery oriented work that focuses earlier in the translational pipeline that has not historically centered or amplified the voices of minoritized communities and individuals with lived experience (Baumann & Cabassa, 2020; Buckley et al, 2022; Shelton, Adsul, Oh, et al, 2021). This prioritization has resulted in often nonviable interventions that are not feasible to implement outside of controlled and well-resourced settings or do not produce the same level of effective outcomes for real-world communities resulting in limited return on investment (Glasgow, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group prioritizes impact, pragmatism, and external validity, after being in settings with patients, clinicians, organizational leaders, community members, and policymakers too many times to count where internal validity was prioritized at the expense of producing viable interventions to deploy in contexts where care is delivered. Our lens highlights the implications of a long tradition of overvaluing, through the investment in research, discovery oriented work that focuses earlier in the translational pipeline that has not historically centered or amplified the voices of minoritized communities and individuals with lived experience (Baumann & Cabassa, 2020; Buckley et al, 2022; Shelton, Adsul, Oh, et al, 2021). This prioritization has resulted in often nonviable interventions that are not feasible to implement outside of controlled and well-resourced settings or do not produce the same level of effective outcomes for real-world communities resulting in limited return on investment (Glasgow, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%