2005
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation type of commutative Noetherian rings. III. Global wildness and tameness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course it is impossible to do so if R is a principal ideal ring. More generally, recall from [29,30,31] that a local ring (R, m, k) is Dedekind-like provided R is reduced and one-dimensional, the integral closure R is generated by at most two elements as an R-module, and m is the Jacobson radical of R. In a long and difficult paper [30] Levy and Klinger classify the indecomposable finitely generated modules over most Dedekind-like rings. There is one exceptional case where the classification has not yet been worked out, namely, where R is a local domain whose residue field is purely inseparable of degree two over k. We will call these Dedekind-like rings exceptional.…”
Section: Modules With Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course it is impossible to do so if R is a principal ideal ring. More generally, recall from [29,30,31] that a local ring (R, m, k) is Dedekind-like provided R is reduced and one-dimensional, the integral closure R is generated by at most two elements as an R-module, and m is the Jacobson radical of R. In a long and difficult paper [30] Levy and Klinger classify the indecomposable finitely generated modules over most Dedekind-like rings. There is one exceptional case where the classification has not yet been worked out, namely, where R is a local domain whose residue field is purely inseparable of degree two over k. We will call these Dedekind-like rings exceptional.…”
Section: Modules With Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For consistency with the notation in [KL1]- [KL3], we shall always write maps on the right for the remainder of §2. The proof of Theorem 1.2 divides naturally into the two cases of Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Constructions In Dimension Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure is so simple that one is tempted to try to generalize Steinitz's result to a larger class of commutative rings. Indeed, in a recent series of papers [KL1], [KL2], [KL3] L. Klingler and L. Levy presented a classification, up to isomorphism, of all finitely generated modules over a class of commutative rings they call "Dedekind-like".…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let R be the m-adic completion of R. All hypotheses on R transfer to R (cf. [KL3,Lemma 11.8] We now assume, by way of contradiction, that D is a complete local Dedekind-like ring and σ : D R is a surjective ring homomorphism. Suppose first that R is reduced.…”
Section: Finding a Suitable Finite-length Modulementioning
confidence: 99%