2012
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2012.662826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations of disability in print news media in postsocialist Ukraine

Abstract: This article examines the narrative discourses that shape representations of disability in newspapers in postsocialist Ukraine, arguing that narratives about disability are linked to a meta-discourse of 'transition' that emphasizes disorder. Further, newspaper coverage prescribes competing and contradictory models of citizenship and personhood for postsocialist subjects living with disabilities. The article offers recommendations for improving press coverage of disability issues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such accounts have generally focussed on Anglophone examples, but important work has also been undertaken in international contexts (e.g. Devlieger, 1998;Saito and Ishiyama 2005;Phillips 2012;Atilola and Olayiwola 2013;O'Dell 2015).…”
Section: Disability Dyslexia and Popular Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such accounts have generally focussed on Anglophone examples, but important work has also been undertaken in international contexts (e.g. Devlieger, 1998;Saito and Ishiyama 2005;Phillips 2012;Atilola and Olayiwola 2013;O'Dell 2015).…”
Section: Disability Dyslexia and Popular Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Phillips (, p. 1) reminds us in an article entitled ‘There are no invalids in the USSR!’, those with ‘physical and mental disabilities in the former Soviet bloc…[were]…stigmatized, hidden from the public, and thus made seemingly invisible’. Actions of this nature are a by‐product of the many societal misperceptions of disabilities, grounded in the aforementioned legacy of defectology (Hartblay, ; Hartblay and Ailchieva, ; Phillips, ). For this conceptualisation of how individuals with disabilities are perceived, we draw on social comparison theory.…”
Section: Armenian Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies by anthropologists and others have noted similarly ambiguous and uneven outcomes of disability rights in postsocialist Eastern Europe, which provides an additional argument in favour of grasping the workings of rights in their historical and geographical specificity. In her work on spinally injured people in Ukraine, Sarah Phillips (: 3–8, 87–92; ) describes a situation in which the rhetoric of the government, activists, and media emphasized their equal rights paired with ‘independence’ while ongoing material, institutional, and social barriers limited their realization in practice. This often compelled disabled people to perform the kind of ‘balancing act’ observed in the monitoring meeting, juggling the new model of equal citizen with the pre‐existing ‘biological citizenship’, which emphasized needs caused by impairments (Phillips : 7).…”
Section: Anti‐discrimination and Accessibility: The Potential And Limmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discourse is far from unique. Anthropologists and other scholars working on disability have documented the recent emergence of similar discursive dichotomies of, on the one hand, equal ‘rights’ bundled with autonomy and, on the other, welfare linked to ‘dependence’ (Harris, Owen & Fisher ; Hartblay ; Phillips : 84‐92, : 493‐5; Zaviršek ). Engaging the Serbian variant of this formation requires going beyond the focus on legal knowledge, practices, and practitioners in much anthropological work on human rights.…”
Section: ‘Independence’ and Labour: The Poetics And Prosaics Of Neolimentioning
confidence: 99%