2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11960-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations of Importance and Interaction of Fuzzy Measures, Capacities, Games and Its Extensions: A Survey

Abstract: Abstract. This paper gives a survey of the theory and results on representation of importance and interaction of fuzzy measures, capacities, games and its extensions: games on convex geometries, bi-capacities, bi-cooperative games, and multi-choice games, etc. All these games are regarded as games on products of distributive lattices or on regular set systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A whole theory on interacting criteria phenomena and on how to measure such phenomena is now well established (mainly) following the work by Murofushi and Soneda (1993), which was generalized by Grabisch (1996b), axiomatized by Grabisch and Roubens (1999), and also studied by other authors, as for example, Fujimoto (2010), Fujimoto et al (2006), Grabisch et al (2000), and Kojadinovic (2007b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A whole theory on interacting criteria phenomena and on how to measure such phenomena is now well established (mainly) following the work by Murofushi and Soneda (1993), which was generalized by Grabisch (1996b), axiomatized by Grabisch and Roubens (1999), and also studied by other authors, as for example, Fujimoto (2010), Fujimoto et al (2006), Grabisch et al (2000), and Kojadinovic (2007b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the interaction among criteria caused by the nonadditivity of a capacity can be measured by a cardinal probabilistic interaction index, in particular the Shapley interaction index 8,26 . More details in the literature on axiomatic properties of all kinds of cardinal probabilistic interaction indices can be found in 4,5,6,10 . Besides the Shapley interaction index 30 suggests to interpret this lack of compatibility with an additive model using the notion of nonadditivity, which is the subject of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%