Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney

Abstract

The negative constructions of Islam which circulate at (inter)national levels include Muslims as fanatical, intolerant, militant, fundamentalist, misogynist and alien. The various constructions of Islam had varying utility for mosque opponents in Sydney, Australia, during the 1980s and 1990s. Fanaticism and intolerance are constructions of Islam which have now had centuries of articulation in the West. These constructions have attained great potency as a result of their reiterative deployment. In Sydney, they were used to influence planning determinations and political decisions within local authorities. The charges of militancy and misogyny did not easily convert into a planning ground for opposing a mosque, but they were used to heighten public unease and widen opposition. Local authorities also refused development consent for mosques on the grounds that the proposals were 'out of character' with surrounding development, drawing on the construction of Muslims as alien and ultimately out of place. The discourses of opposition to mosques did not simply rely on the stereotypes of Islam, but also drew heavily on cultural constructions of what constituted a local citizen and the local community. Mosque supporters attempted to deploy counter-constructions, of Muslims as moderate, tolerant, peaceful, clean living, family-orientated, ordinary local citizens. A social construction approach is used to examine the politics surrounding mosque development in Sydney. This reveals both the socio-spatial impacts of identity constructions (of a minority group and the imagined dominant community) as well as the important role of space and locale. Copyright Royal Dutch Geographical Society 2001.

"Bird cages and boiling pots for potential diseases": contested ecologies of urban 'Swiftlet farming' in George Town, Malaysia

“…Scholars like Dunn (2001) and Loftus (2012) have argued that everyday, local spaces are key sites for the symbolic contestation of unequal power relations. Their work aims to show how particular 'strategies and tactics' of everyday life are useful for considering the 'elements of creative resistance' to dominant power relations in society, employed by people such as city residents, urban activists, and even researchers (see de Certeau 1984).…”

Ethnic Amsterdam : Immigrants and Urban Change in the Twentieth Century

“…In other cases, it can be little more than a bureaucratic procedure (see Wessels 2003). The acquisition of prayer room has generally been analysed as the result of two parties making demands and then striving to reach an agreement acceptable to both (Amiraux 2001;Cesari 2001;Dunn 2001;Lindo 1999;Rath et al 1996). Analyses of these negotiation processes can generate insights into the relation between state and religion and the position of Muslims in different countries, from which we can draw inferences about relative religious freedom and the bargaining power of collective actors.…”

Measurement and Spatial Effects of the Immigrant-Created Cultural Diversity in Sydney

“…Although many issues were generated by the arrival of a large number of people of different ethnic and social background, policy makers for years showed no interest in solving diverse settlement issues, like housing, unemployment, recognition of classifications and skills, and diverse other social and welfare problems (Cutts 1992;CIE 1992, xv;Jupp 1991,106;Cox 1987, 90). Despite the policy changes since the 1970s and three decades of application of multicultural policies at diverse levels of society, many non-English speaking migrants still do not feel welcome (SMH 12, 2005;Dunn 2001;Betts 1999, 316;Hage 1998, 16;).…”