AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representative Post-Stall Modeling of T-tail Regional Jet and Turboprop Aircraft for Flight Training Simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model structure is shown in Eq. (19). The stall buffet frequency response function (H (jω)) can be estimated from the PSD as shown in Figure 15, assuming that the driving white noise input signal u has an intensity of one.…”
Section: Ivb Buffet Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model structure is shown in Eq. (19). The stall buffet frequency response function (H (jω)) can be estimated from the PSD as shown in Figure 15, assuming that the driving white noise input signal u has an intensity of one.…”
Section: Ivb Buffet Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 A similar research has been done in modeling the stall characteristics due to different parts of the aircraft. 19 Current practice is thus that stall models are created using wind tunnel, CFD and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aircraft design is an evolving area and with the availability of advanced numerical techniques such as finite element methods and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), it is now possible to do an initial detailed design virtually (Raymer 1999;Okonkwo and Smith 2016;Rizzi et al 2010). A challenging area of any design is the prediction of aerodynamic coefficients during and beyond aircraft stall (Ciliberti et al 2017;Lutz et al 2015;Grote and Radespiel 2006;Teng et al 2015;Lutz et al 2016;Teng et al 2016). More specifically, the pitching moment and lift and drag coefficients have complex characteristics (Phillips 2010), which at high angles of attack may change significantly post-stall, in some cases leading to an autorotation and the development of a spin (Rao and Go 2019;Bennett and Lawson 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, novel modeling methods have appeared, such as those based on CFD [16] or representative methods based on aircraft geometry and/or configuration. [17,18] Regardless the used modeling method, a major unanswered question is what level of fidelity is actually required for effective pilot stall training. While pilots are found to be able to notice even small changes in key stall model parameters in some experiments [19], recent pilot-in-the-loop evaluations of stall models of varying fidelity levels found no differences in subjective ratings from a group of experienced pilots [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%