2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representativeness consideration in the selection of classification algorithms for the ECG signal quality assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This introduces two substantial issues: (1) once the real prevalence of the phenomenon of interest is markedly over-represented in the training and testing data, extra care is required when interpreting the results and inferring about performance in a real-world scenario (Sun et al 2015, Lever 2016, Yijing et al 2016, Fernando and Tsokos 2021; (2) the same over-representation might have induced the developers of other algorithms to underestimate the fact that they were dealing with an extreme class imbalance problem (i.e. P = N) (Yijing et al 2016, Thabtah et al 2020, which is known to have potentially disruptive effects on the robustness performance of classifiers based on machine learning (Keskes et al 2022). This class imbalance leads these classifiers to have unsatisfactory results when tested on extremely imbalanced dataset (Yijing et al 2016, Thabtah et al 2020, Albaba et al 2021, Fernando and Tsokos 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introduces two substantial issues: (1) once the real prevalence of the phenomenon of interest is markedly over-represented in the training and testing data, extra care is required when interpreting the results and inferring about performance in a real-world scenario (Sun et al 2015, Lever 2016, Yijing et al 2016, Fernando and Tsokos 2021; (2) the same over-representation might have induced the developers of other algorithms to underestimate the fact that they were dealing with an extreme class imbalance problem (i.e. P = N) (Yijing et al 2016, Thabtah et al 2020, which is known to have potentially disruptive effects on the robustness performance of classifiers based on machine learning (Keskes et al 2022). This class imbalance leads these classifiers to have unsatisfactory results when tested on extremely imbalanced dataset (Yijing et al 2016, Thabtah et al 2020, Albaba et al 2021, Fernando and Tsokos 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision is interested in measuring the correctness among the total positive labels. The recall is signi cant for the true positive rate and expresses how the positive class is predicted (Keskes et al 2022). The ACC is used to measure the percent for the true labels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SQA approach, i.e., the definition of certain signal quality indexes, has gained large attention in scientific literature up to today [ 29 , 30 ]. A variety of SQA approaches have been proposed; the majority include classifying the signals to fulfill certain conditions—in trivial cases: acceptable or unacceptable (e.g., [ 31 , 32 ]. However, approaches where more conditions have been proposed exist (e.g., [ 33 ]).…”
Section: Signal Quality Assessment For Ecg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, approaches where more conditions have been proposed exist (e.g., [ 33 ]). Today, the machine learning and heuristic-classifiers-based approaches for SQA of ECG signals constitute the vast amount of research literature [ 22 , 32 ].…”
Section: Signal Quality Assessment For Ecg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%