2016
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1201327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representativeness from Within: A Comparison between the ILO and the ISO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…those affiliated to the ituc and the ioe), which are placed on an almost equal footing with states in all the bodies of the ilo, and in particular in the Governing Body. While tripartism is specific to the ilo in the world of international organisations, other institutions involve non-state participants in their decision-making-for example, the International Organization for Standardization (Louis and Ruwet, 2017), and at the national level, joint bodies such as economic and social councils. Tripartite participants are recognised as constituent members of the ilo and the only ones officially empowered to make decisions.…”
Section: States Are Central But Not Exclusive Participants In the Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those affiliated to the ituc and the ioe), which are placed on an almost equal footing with states in all the bodies of the ilo, and in particular in the Governing Body. While tripartism is specific to the ilo in the world of international organisations, other institutions involve non-state participants in their decision-making-for example, the International Organization for Standardization (Louis and Ruwet, 2017), and at the national level, joint bodies such as economic and social councils. Tripartite participants are recognised as constituent members of the ilo and the only ones officially empowered to make decisions.…”
Section: States Are Central But Not Exclusive Participants In the Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those affiliated to the ituc and the ioe), which are placed on an almost equal footing with states in all the bodies of the ilo, and in particular in the Governing Body. While tripartism is specific to the ilo in the world of international organisations, other institutions involve non-state participants in their decision-making-for example, the International Organization for Standardization (Louis and Ruwet, 2017), and at the national level, joint bodies such as economic and social councils.…”
Section: States Are Central But Not Exclusive Participants In the Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ILO has a problem: while its years of work have led to advances in labour and social protections, including protections around wages and hours (Maul, 2019), and provisions for migrant workers (Piper, 2022), its effica-Open Journal of Political Science cy in contemporary world politics is challenged by several factors (Helfer, 2007;Maul, 2019). These factors include internal tensions between decision-making members of the organization, who compete to maintain the greatest amount of influence over the ILO's agenda (Maul, 2019;Baccaro & Mele, 2012), as well as the organization's insufficient inclusion of grassroots and community labour advocates, whose local expertise is recognized in ILO programming, but not in its decision-making apparatus (Helfer, 2007;Louis & Ruwet, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%