2022
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representativeness of autistic samples in studies recruiting through social media

Abstract: Survey-based research with recruitment through online channels is a convenient way to obtain large samples and has recently been increasingly used in autism research. However, sampling from online channels may be associated with a high risk of sampling bias causing findings not to be generalizable to the autism population. Here we examined autism studies that have sampled on social media for markers of sampling bias. Most samples showed one or more indicators of sampling bias, in the form of reversed sex ratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reflected in their qualifications, they likely corresponded to a profile with fair-to-strong camouflage and compensation abilities, more normative verbal style, and possibly stronger executive function than others within the autistic spectrum [ 120 122 ]. Individuals with this profile seem disproportionately represented in studies which recruit via social media or other online methods [ 123 , 124 ]. As this is the approach adopted by the present study and several others in this relatively young field [ 22 , 30 , 31 , 52 54 ], findings are likely unrepresentative of all within the diverse autistic community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reflected in their qualifications, they likely corresponded to a profile with fair-to-strong camouflage and compensation abilities, more normative verbal style, and possibly stronger executive function than others within the autistic spectrum [ 120 122 ]. Individuals with this profile seem disproportionately represented in studies which recruit via social media or other online methods [ 123 , 124 ]. As this is the approach adopted by the present study and several others in this relatively young field [ 22 , 30 , 31 , 52 54 ], findings are likely unrepresentative of all within the diverse autistic community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, 99% of participants scored above the AQ28 cutoff (>65) indicative of ASD. Consistent with other online self‐report survey research in autistic adults, the sample included a relatively high proportion of participants designated female at birth (Rødgaard et al, 2022; Rubenstein & Furnier, 2021) compared to population‐based estimates for autistic children (Maenner et al, 2021) and adults (Dietz et al, 2020). The study was approved by The George Washington University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and all participants provided informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autism studies that sample through online (social media) channels are at risk of sampling bias, including reversed sex ratio (more women than men), higher education levels, less participants with an intellectual disability and a later age of diagnosis compared to samples from a population study (Rødgaard et al, 2022). Some of these biases can be seen in the sample from Study 1.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%