Representativeness of the UN post-2015 national consultations

Siddiqui, Faraz Rahim; Friedman, Eric; Nader, A.

doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70319-5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While in general there is a need to strengthen forms of deliberative democracy beyond the nation state, 46 including in institutions dealing with global health, a lot needs to improve on the output legitimacy (accountability, transparency effectiveness) and certainly input legitimacy (deliberation and representation) of global health and sustainable development regimes. 47 Research on the development of the health SDG goal has indicated limited participation of local communities in setting priorities for this goal and the governance gap between the global policy-makers and the ‘target groups.’ 48 Proper regulation, the management of conflicts of interest and a strong democratic framework to govern global health programs all require close attention in the implementation of the SDGs. This should not merely be about the international organizations itself and their engagement with corporate actors, but also touch upon the politics and agency of philanthropic organizations, academia and civil society.…”

Section: The Status Quo Of Resilience and Multi-stakeholder Governancmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism Comment on "Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality"

Pas

2016

Int J Health Policy Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been much reflection on the need for a new understanding of global health and the urgency of a paradigm shift to address global health issues. A crucial question is whether this is still possible in current modes of global governance based on capitalist values. Four reflections are provided. (1) Ecological –centered values must become central in any future global health framework. (2) The objectives of ‘sustainability’ and ‘economic growth’ present a profound contradiction. (3) The resilience discourse maintains a gridlock in the functioning of the global health system. (4) The legitimacy of multi-stakeholder governance arrangements in global health requires urgent attention. A dual track approach is suggested. It must be aimed to transform capitalism into something better for global health while in parallel there is an urgent need to imagine a future and pathways to a different world order rooted in the principles of social justice, protecting the commons and a central role for the preservation of ecology.

show abstract

Section: The Status Quo Of Resilience and Multi-stakeholder Governancmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism Comment on "Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality"

Pas

2016

Int J Health Policy Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Tracing the SDG Deliberation Process: A Focus on Health, Cities and Data

Espey

2022

Science in Negotiation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness"

Hall

2017

Int J Health Policy Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As healthcare resources become increasingly scarce due to growing demand and stagnating budgets, the need for effective priority setting and resource allocation will become ever more critical to providing sustainable care to patients. While societal values should certainly play a part in guiding these processes, the methodology used to capture these values need not necessarily be limited to multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA)-based processes including ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes.’ However, if decision-makers intend to not only incorporates the values of the public they serve into decisions but have the decisions enacted as well, consideration should be given to more direct involvement of stakeholders. Based on the examples provided by Baltussen et al, MCDA-based processes like ‘evidence-informed deliberative processes’ could be one way of achieving this laudable goal.

show abstract

Representativeness of the UN post-2015 national consultations

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism Comment on "Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality"

Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism Comment on "Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality"

Tracing the SDG Deliberation Process: A Focus on Health, Cities and Data

Don’t Discount Societal Value in Cost-Effectiveness Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness"

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About