1988
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Cumulative Germination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents dry weight gained by a unit area of crop in a unit time expressed as g m -2 day -1 (Brown and Mayer, 1988). …”
Section: Crop Growth Rate (G M -2 Day -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents dry weight gained by a unit area of crop in a unit time expressed as g m -2 day -1 (Brown and Mayer, 1988). …”
Section: Crop Growth Rate (G M -2 Day -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although splines are suitable for curve-fitting by LMs, germination time-courses are frequently modeled as continuous curves according to a few sigmoidal functions that have been shown to be specifically valuable for this scope but are not suitable to fitting by LMs [50]. Modeling the whole germination progress curve can be more informative than considering time a categorical variable or using splines, but it can require stronger assumptions.…”
Section: Considering Time As a Continuous Variable Requires Parametrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where IMBT is the cumulative imbibition at time T; M is an asymptote for the cumulative imbibition and represents the maximum IMB-value for each batch of seeds; l (lag of imbibition) is a location parameter that estimates the latest time at which imbibition is strictly zero, which in practice represents the time that is necessary for at least one seed start imbibing; k (rate of imbibition) is a scale parameter estimating the rate of imbibition completion over time with l + k estimating the time that is necessary for the completion of 63% of cumulative imbibition; and, c is a dimensionless shape parameter estimating the symmetry of the distribution of imbibition over time, with 3.25 ≤ c ≤ 3.61 showing symmetry and representing a good approximation to the normal distribution, c < 3.25 positive asymmetry, and c > 3.61 negative asymmetry [20][21][22]. The fitted equations were only accepted after a consistency check of parameter estimates and imbibition predictions against the original data [23].…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%