2021
DOI: 10.1080/0735648x.2021.1918210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing juvenile lifers: do attorneys in parole hearings matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessments of a juvenile lifer’s record in written decision statements are linked to their reoffending risk, but these assessments are highly subjective and depend on how well the candidate can talk a good game (Martel, 2010). To that end, assistance of legal counsel could benefit in enabling an effective presentation at the hearing and securing reentry services (see Kokkalera, 2021). The Supreme Court in Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) has recognized the need for limited due process protections, including the right to an attorney in all parole revocation hearings, although access may vary across states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessments of a juvenile lifer’s record in written decision statements are linked to their reoffending risk, but these assessments are highly subjective and depend on how well the candidate can talk a good game (Martel, 2010). To that end, assistance of legal counsel could benefit in enabling an effective presentation at the hearing and securing reentry services (see Kokkalera, 2021). The Supreme Court in Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) has recognized the need for limited due process protections, including the right to an attorney in all parole revocation hearings, although access may vary across states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lifers’ parole hearings in the U.S. have been viewed as containing “some adversarial elements, but the overall process does not resemble a commitment offense retrial” (Young, 2016: 444; Kokkalera, 2022: 189). Most U.S. parole systems allow prosecutors to give written or oral input at parole hearings (Cassidy, 2019; Demleitner, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those with a lengthier history of disciplinary infractions are less likely to be granted parole (Young et al, 2015). Engagement in a variety of prison programs such as vocational certifications, education, and counseling is also a significant positive predictor of parole release (Bell, 2019; Bernhardt et al, 2010; Kokkalera, 2022).…”
Section: Review Of Parole Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, prosecutorial objections emphasizing blameworthiness based on the sentencing offense may mirror what has been noted in resentencing motions in one state with post- Miller reforms (see Ouellet & Wareham, 2023). Additionally, research has also indicated that legal representation can influence parole outcomes (Bell, 2019; Kokkalera, 2022).…”
Section: Review Of Parole Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%