2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
155
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
155
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Resilience refers to the ability of the supply chain to cope with unexpected disturbances. In supply chain systems, the objective is to react efficiently to the negative effects of disturbances (which could be more or less severe) (Zobel 2011). The aim of the resilient strategies has two manifolds (Haimes 2006): (1) to recover the desired values of the states of a system that has been disturbed, within an acceptable time period and at an acceptable cost; and (2) to reduce the effectiveness of the disturbance by changing the level of the effectiveness of a potential threat.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilience refers to the ability of the supply chain to cope with unexpected disturbances. In supply chain systems, the objective is to react efficiently to the negative effects of disturbances (which could be more or less severe) (Zobel 2011). The aim of the resilient strategies has two manifolds (Haimes 2006): (1) to recover the desired values of the states of a system that has been disturbed, within an acceptable time period and at an acceptable cost; and (2) to reduce the effectiveness of the disturbance by changing the level of the effectiveness of a potential threat.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dummy variables and the mixed effects model each incorporate individual scenario disruptions and measure the extent to which the industry resilience parameter changes for different scenarios. Both the intercept and slope describe the relationship between the initial impact and recovery time, often referred to as robustness and rapidity in the resilience literature (Bruneau et al 2003;Zobel 2011). The intercept changes when the model includes different power outage scenarios, and we conclude that the power outage scenario impacts the relationship between the initial impact and recovery time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruneau et al (2003) quantify resilience by measuring the expected loss due to an earthquake over time. Zobel (2011) builds on this resilience metric by relating recovery time to the initial impact and analyzing how preparedness efforts might need to trade off reducing the initial impact with reducing recovery time. Other approaches to quantifying resilience include comparing the estimated loss in economic output with the maximum predicted loss in output (Rose 2007), developing an influence or decision diagram that incorporates pre-disruption and post-disruption decisions (McDaniels et al 2008), calculating the ability of a node to remain connected to a degraded network (Dueñas-Osorio et al 2004), and combining the ability of a network to provide service with the time to restore service when failure occurs (Whitson and Ramirez-Marquez 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particular type of measure that has been used to represent an entity's capacity for resisting loss and then recovering over time has been resilience (Zobel, 2011;Zobel & Khansa, 2014). Resilience, as a measure, can provide a more complete picture of the community's viability over the long-term by extending the descriptive abilities of short-term emergency related measures such as deprivation costs.…”
Section: Specifying Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the resilience of q(t) over the study horizon [0,T*], we adopt the engineering-based approach of calculating resilience to be the area under q(t) as a percentage of the total area Q* available if no loss or outside influence on q occurs (See Bruneau et al, 2003;Zobel, 2011;Zobel & Khansa, 2012):…”
Section: Resilience-based Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%