Representing qualitative social science in computational models to aid reasoning under uncertainty: National security examples

Abstract

Representing causal social science knowledge in models is difficult: much of the best knowledge is qualitative and ambiguously conditional, unlike the knowledge in “physics models.” This paper describes a stream of RAND research that began with qualitative models providing a structured depiction of casual factors creating effects. That has subsequently been extended to an unusual kind of uncertainty sensitive computational modeling that enables exploratory reasoning and analysis. We illustrate the approach with applications to counterterrorism, detection of terrorists, and nuclear crises. We believe that the approach will complement other approaches that can reflect social science phenomena [see other papers in this special issue of JDMS] and that the approach has broad potential within and beyond the national security domain. We also believe that it has the potential to inform empirical work—encouraging a transition from the step-by-step empirical testing of simple discrete hypotheses to the testing and refinement of more comprehensive causal models.

Influencing Adversary States: Quelling Perfect Storms

“…49-67). Factor trees have many applications in defense (Davis and O'Mahony, 2017) and in policy analysis generally.…”

Concept development for comprehensive operations support with modeling and simulation

“…In the words of the US National Research Council: “the modeling of cognition and action by individuals and groups is quite possibly the most difficult task humans have yet undertaken.” 28 Inspiration can and should come from social and behavioral sciences. 29 We follow the Dutch Ministry of Defence (MoD) conceptualization that conflict and interventions take place in three landscapes: the physical, information, and human landscapes. 2 The effects that actors have on each other and on the world are not limited to one landscape, and have intentional and unintentional side effects on all landscapes.…”

Promises and pitfalls of computational modelling for insurgency conflicts

“…11 However, these methodologies have important caveats in terms of data availability and conceptual challenges. 12 In this paper, we analyze these promises and pitfalls of various computational modeling methods for the military domain by analyzing models identified in the literature.…”