2019 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/vnc48660.2019.9062828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Realistic Human Driver Behaviors using a Finite Size Gaussian Process Kernel Bank

Abstract: The performance of cooperative vehicular applications is tightly dependent on the reliability of the underneath Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication technology. V2X standards, such as Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) and Cellular-V2X (C-V2X), which are passing their research phase before being mandated in the US, are supposed to serve as reliable circulatory systems for the timecritical information in vehicular networks; however, they are still heavily suffering from scalability issues in real … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we want to mention that our approach can benefit from parallel computing during the bank kennel creation and during forecasting, as the model predictions can be computed independently in parallel, therefore the use of GPU or a CPU with additional cores will further reduce the computation time. Based on our experiments and previous work [51], we choose a TW$TW$ size of 30 time‐steps (3 s) and PTEth$PTE_{th}$ = 50 cm for the training, model generation, and forecasting. The selected training parameters consider an acceptable path history while also meeting the computational requirement of the safety applications.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we want to mention that our approach can benefit from parallel computing during the bank kennel creation and during forecasting, as the model predictions can be computed independently in parallel, therefore the use of GPU or a CPU with additional cores will further reduce the computation time. Based on our experiments and previous work [51], we choose a TW$TW$ size of 30 time‐steps (3 s) and PTEth$PTE_{th}$ = 50 cm for the training, model generation, and forecasting. The selected training parameters consider an acceptable path history while also meeting the computational requirement of the safety applications.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social navigation in mixed autonomy has shown the potential of collaboration among AVs and HVs [27]. Current works in social navigation tackle the MARL cooperation by assuming the nature of agent interactions [28], [29] or by directly modeling or classifying human driver behaviors [30]- [32]. Different methods to predict or classify driver behaviors are based on driver attributes [33], graph theory [34], game theory [1] and data mining [35].…”
Section: A Driver Behavior and Social Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social navigation in mixed autonomy has shown the potential of collaboration among AVs and HVs [40]. Current works in social navigation tackle the MARL cooperation by assuming the nature of agent interactions [41], [42] or by directly modeling or classifying human driver behaviors [43]- [45]. Different methods to predict or classify driver behaviors are based on driver attributes [46], graph theory [47], game theory [1] and data mining [48].…”
Section: A Driver Behavior and Social Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%