1988
DOI: 10.1080/03066158808438381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing reciprocity, reproducing domination: Ideology and the labour process in Latin American contract farming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
54
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In his research, Vellema reviewed the social science literature on contract farming from different perspectives, such as political economy, e.g., [12][13][14], and new institutional economics [15]. These perspectives focus on analysing the effects of contractual arrangements on the decision-making by farmers, whether they considered them to be negative or positive.…”
Section: In Search Of An Integrative Methodology: the Example Of Aspamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his research, Vellema reviewed the social science literature on contract farming from different perspectives, such as political economy, e.g., [12][13][14], and new institutional economics [15]. These perspectives focus on analysing the effects of contractual arrangements on the decision-making by farmers, whether they considered them to be negative or positive.…”
Section: In Search Of An Integrative Methodology: the Example Of Aspamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, farmers go for contracting as it provides access to assured market and prices, costly inputs, and new technology (Eaton and Shepherd, 2001). But, for the individual farmers, it is not the contract per se but the relationship it represents which is crucial as the divergence between the two may prove crucial in determining the development of contract farming as an institution (Clapp, 1988). Further, it is the context of the contract which can make a whole lot of difference as there are many actors and factors in the environment which influence the working and outcome of contracts.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the grower is typically (if not invariably) responsible for all costs of production and it is she/he, not the TNC, who has to bear all risks related to weather, labour and resource quality. It is this peculiar construction of the 'independence' of farmers that is of value to large companies [Clapp, 1988;Morvaridi, 1991;Korovkin, 1992].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%