2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10612-005-3182-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Theory and Theorising in Criminal Justice Studies: Practising Theory Considered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This of course does not detract from their monumental achievement; it is only to illustrate the doxic nature of crime for organising even critical criminological enquiry. Doxic categories such as crime operate as an epistemological obstacle to the advancement of knowledge within criminology and to the further development of criminology as a critical social science [25,27].…”
Section: The Practice Of Imaginative Criminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This of course does not detract from their monumental achievement; it is only to illustrate the doxic nature of crime for organising even critical criminological enquiry. Doxic categories such as crime operate as an epistemological obstacle to the advancement of knowledge within criminology and to the further development of criminology as a critical social science [25,27].…”
Section: The Practice Of Imaginative Criminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of theory, as Frauley (2005) suggests, there is a struggle in criminology between practicing theory (thinking theoretically) and referring to it (the technocratic 'protective service' orientation of criminal justice). Criminology today is contextualized in a framework of criminal justice for both academics and those seeking information from the discipline.…”
Section: Smmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and managerial regimes (neo-liberal social and economic policy) that accompany this. These indicators have been variously adopted to discuss the rise of criminal justice departments (Frauley 2005, Huey 2011, Chunn and Menzies 2006. They are powerful conceptual tools to assist us in explaining the lure of specialized programs, particularly in terms of attracting students (interesting areas of study, and a degree that could equal a job) and how universities come to rely on markets outside of the state to sustain themselves.…”
Section: Chapter 1 -Examining the Shifting Post-secondary Education Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much ink has been spilt documenting the rise of criminology/criminal justice studies in the United States (Remington 1990, Cullen 1995, Farrell and Koch 1995, Deflem 2002, Hemmens 2002, Crank 2003, Zaman 2007, Wellford 2007, Angelique, Nolasco, Vaughn and del Carmen 2010, Canada (Potts 1963, Szabo 1963, Grygier 1963, Hendry 1963, Markson and Hartman 1963, Edwards 1982, Halsted 1985, Ericson and Carriere 1994, Hackler 1994, Menzies and Chunn 1999, Wood and Shearing 1999, Woods 1999, Stenning and Murphy 1999, Brouder 1999, Haggerty 2001, Kurasawa 2002, Frauley 2005, Parkinson 2008, Doyle and Moore 2011, Huey 2011, Hogeveen 2011, Jochelson and Kohm 2013, and Great Britain (Bottoms 1995, Sparks 1997, Zahn 1999, Braithwaite 2000, Walters 2003). This chapter examines the origins of criminal justice in post-secondary spaces in Canada, its connection to criminology, and outlines the widespread critique of these programs, claiming criminal justice is a protective service, not a social science.…”
Section: Chapter 3: the Problematic: Canadian Criminal Justice Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation