2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-010-0185-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repricing of executive stock options

Abstract: Repricing, Executive stock options, Incentive contracts, Variable accounting charges, Agency costs, G30, G32, G34, G38, J33, L14,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…andBebchuk et al (2002) Sautner and Weber (2011). provide empirical support for the self-dealing hypothesis by showing that when governance structures are weak, stock option plans are designed in a way that is favored by managers.6 Corresponding models have been developed and analyzed byKulatilaka and Markus (1994), Rubinstein (1995), Carpenter (1998),Hull and White (2004),Ammann and Seiz (2004),Cvitanić et al (2008), andBrisley and Anderson (2008).7 Yang and Carleton (2010) analyze the repricing of executive stock options under new accounting rules in an optimal contracting setting. 8 SeeBettis et al (2005), p. 469.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…andBebchuk et al (2002) Sautner and Weber (2011). provide empirical support for the self-dealing hypothesis by showing that when governance structures are weak, stock option plans are designed in a way that is favored by managers.6 Corresponding models have been developed and analyzed byKulatilaka and Markus (1994), Rubinstein (1995), Carpenter (1998),Hull and White (2004),Ammann and Seiz (2004),Cvitanić et al (2008), andBrisley and Anderson (2008).7 Yang and Carleton (2010) analyze the repricing of executive stock options under new accounting rules in an optimal contracting setting. 8 SeeBettis et al (2005), p. 469.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%