1998
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199805000-00080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of 99Tcm-MAG3 clearance calculated using the Bubeck method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were not very different from those of other authors, who estimated the reproducibility of 99m Tc-MAG3 single-or two-sample clearance with an SD of around 12% [14][15][16][17]. Kotzerke et al [14], Werner et al [15] and Russell and Dubovsky [16] performed the study retrospectively in different patient populations using a single-sample method, and calculated the reproducibility as 11.7, 11.7 and 12%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results were not very different from those of other authors, who estimated the reproducibility of 99m Tc-MAG3 single-or two-sample clearance with an SD of around 12% [14][15][16][17]. Kotzerke et al [14], Werner et al [15] and Russell and Dubovsky [16] performed the study retrospectively in different patient populations using a single-sample method, and calculated the reproducibility as 11.7, 11.7 and 12%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Inconsistent results of the reproducibility of 99m Tc-MAG3 clearance have been reported, ranging from 6.3 to 40.4% depending on the level of renal function, the clearance measurement technique applied and the time interval between the two studies [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]24]. However, in serial measurements of renal function, especially in patients with renal failure, good reproducibility of the test is vitally important for monitoring renal function and to ascertain whether changes in renal function are related to disease or to the limited reproducibility of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations