2016
DOI: 10.1017/jns.2015.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of a web-based FFQ for 13- to 15-year-old Danish adolescents

Abstract: FFQ are widely used in large-scale studies to assess dietary intake. To aid interpretation of diet–disease associations assessment of validity must be performed. Reproducibility is one aspect of validity focusing on the stability of repeated assessment with the same method which may also reveal problems in instrument design or participant instructions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of a web-based FFQ targeting Danish adolescents within the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may indicate better test-retest reproducibility of the questionnaire in terms of dietary behaviors in children and adolescents with stable but restrictive eating habits (consuming key foods, healthy or unhealthy, with low frequency and/or consuming only a few selected foods with higher frequency). Better test-retest reproducibility of FFQs for foods consumed rarely or never has been reported in other studies [15,16,31]. The differences between both administrations of the questionnaire were more scattered in adolescents than in children, and the most between the adolescent's test and parent's test, which confirms the results of other statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings may indicate better test-retest reproducibility of the questionnaire in terms of dietary behaviors in children and adolescents with stable but restrictive eating habits (consuming key foods, healthy or unhealthy, with low frequency and/or consuming only a few selected foods with higher frequency). Better test-retest reproducibility of FFQs for foods consumed rarely or never has been reported in other studies [15,16,31]. The differences between both administrations of the questionnaire were more scattered in adolescents than in children, and the most between the adolescent's test and parent's test, which confirms the results of other statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The test-retest reproducibility for food items found in the present study in children (agreement: 59.0-98.4%, kappa: 0.46-0.81) and adolescents (42.9-80.1%, kappa: 0.30-0.44) was similar or higher than previously reported [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Parent-administered semi-quantitative FFQs to assess children's diet demonstrated cross-classification agreement, which ranged from 33-69% in Danish children [32] and 62.1-99.4% in Spanish children [37], but it ranged from 44-82% in New Zealand children using a short non-quantitative FFQ [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have generally reported lower percentage agreements in adolescents [38,39,40]. Øverby et al [38] included 58 Norwegian adolescents (14–15 years) who completed a 131-item FFQ four weeks apart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%