Reproducibility of Assessment of Left-Ventricular Function using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography

Abstract

Reproducibility of results is an important point in assessing the utility of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating changes in left-ventricular function. The purpose of the present study was to define the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the qualitative assessment of left-ventricular regional wall motion and the quantitative assessment of global left-ventricular function. In addition, the interstudy reproducibility of two examinations was tested when the probe was displaced and replaced in the esophagus. A transesophageal short-axis view at the level of the papillary muscles was obtained in 86 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In the 80 patients with adequate images, regional wall motion was visually graded and area ejection fraction was calculated by two observers and assessment was repeated by the same observer one day later. The same observer graded wall motion differently in only 5% (24/480) of segments. Grading by two observers differed in 9% (43/480) of segments. Assessment differed by one grade at the most and in not more than 2 out of 6 segments per patient. Repeated measurements of area ejection fraction (AEF) by the same observer correlated well (r = 0.97 before and r = 0.97 after cardiopulmonary bypass) with a mean percent difference of 6%. A similarly close correlation was found for measurements of two observers (r = 0.90 and r = 0.93, respectively) with a mean percent difference of 10% for area ejection fraction. The correlation for the first and second examination in the same patient by one observer was acceptable (r = 0.78 and r = 0.80, respectively) with a mean percent difference of 15% for area ejection fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluating the morphology of the left atrial appendage by a transesophageal echocardiographic 3-dimensional printed model

“…On the contrary, we had acceptable inter and intraobserver variations of LAA measurement of 3D TEE in both qualitative and quantitative assessments, which showed similar efficiency as Deutsch research in which both the wall motion grading and area ejection fraction of left ventricle acquired from intraoperative TEE had sufficiency inter and intraobserver reproducibility of evaluating left ventricular function. [ 25 ] In our study, among the 18 patients, the morphology classifications of 17 patients determined by 3D cardiac chamber models highly agreed with those obtained by CT-VR. The consistency Kappa value was 0.919.…”

Transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac and vascular surgery: implications and observer variability

“…It seems possible, however, that different observers come to reproducible and nearly identical conclusions regarding LV function. 32 Evaluation of atheromatous plaques in the thoracic aorta is not without dif®culties: Konstadt and colleagues 18 showed that TOE is sensitive in the ascending aorta in 100% of cases, is speci®c for atheromatous disease in 60%, and has a positive predictive value of only 34% but a negative predictive value of 100%. Hartman and colleagues 33 showed a high reproducibility among three observers but only 57% interpretable images of the ascending aorta.…”

Brain natriuretic peptide is not predictive of dilated cardiomyopathy in Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients and carriers

“…Global Left Ventricular Function (LVF) was judged as good, fair, or poor by an experienced cardiologist (L.D.) [13,14]. The Fractional Shortening Index was calculated (FSI) as follows: ((LVEDD-LVESD)/LVEDD)*100%.…”