Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease which is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart failure. Recent discoveries in disease pathophysiology have been translated into effective therapies tested in clinical trials. The studies which have led to the regulatory board approval of therapies for PAH have focused on surrogate and intermediate end points, thought to reflect quantity and quality of life, respectively. However, validation of many of these surrogates is incomplete. It is also unknown which indicators of function or long-term survival should be used to formulate decisions regarding addition, discontinuation, or combination of therapies. Identification of suitable end points would therefore not only help investigators design appropriate clinical trials, but also assist clinicians in caring for patients with PAH. Hemodynamic, cardiac imaging, plasma biomarkers, and exercise testing hold some promise as potential surrogate end points for PAH. Functional status and quality of life assessments may also have important roles. Future studies should validate the most promising surrogate markers, so that patients, clinicians, subjects, and investigators may benefit from the advantages they confer on clinical care and on clinical trials.The past several years have yielded an explosion of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of several new medical therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The hopes for these and all treatments for potentially fatal diseases are 1) to improve how a patient feels or functions and/ or 2) to prolong survival. While simply stated, the assessment of progress towards these goals may be quite complex [1][2][3][4][5][6].New PAH therapies have gained regulatory board approval based on studies with intermediate and surrogate end points as primary outcomes, believed to reflect the impact of these drugs on quality of life (QOL) and survival, respectively. While hemodynamic, plasma, cardiac imaging, exercise, functional, and QOL parameters are promising candidates, the reliability and validity of these measures are not clearly established. In addition, there are no RCTs addressing the use of such end points in guiding management decisions in PAH, such as changing, intensifying, escalating, or combining therapies. Despite this lack of evidence, clinicians who