2017
DOI: 10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n5p515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of heart rate and perceptual demands of game-based training drills in handball players

Abstract: -Game-based training are popular in team-sports; however there is a lack of research specific to team handball. The aim of this study was to assess i) the test-retest reliability of heart rate (HR), time spent in HR zone intensities and rating of perceived exertion of a novel small-sided game, ii) and whether it is comparable to that of generic intermittent shuttle running and match play with team handball players. Fourteen elite male handball players completed each exercise comprising two periods of 10min int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the intersubject variability of HR peak and mean responses were already quite low and further reductions caused by prescription method choice for a HIIT session that was only 10 min long are basically unrealistic. Even though the intertrial reliability of high‐intensity intermittent exercise HR is very high, with TE being as low as 1.2%, 27 and although CVs of only 2.3% for % HR reserve have already been obtained in other studies, 28 the results obtained in this study suggest that prescription method choice will hardly make a practically significant difference. On the contrary, TE for VO 2 was found to be 1.02% 29 during maximal and between 2.4% 30 and 2.8% 31 during submaximal exercise, suggesting that intersubject variability reduction from 9.3 to 7.5% in VO 2peak could be close to practically meaningful change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Namely, the intersubject variability of HR peak and mean responses were already quite low and further reductions caused by prescription method choice for a HIIT session that was only 10 min long are basically unrealistic. Even though the intertrial reliability of high‐intensity intermittent exercise HR is very high, with TE being as low as 1.2%, 27 and although CVs of only 2.3% for % HR reserve have already been obtained in other studies, 28 the results obtained in this study suggest that prescription method choice will hardly make a practically significant difference. On the contrary, TE for VO 2 was found to be 1.02% 29 during maximal and between 2.4% 30 and 2.8% 31 during submaximal exercise, suggesting that intersubject variability reduction from 9.3 to 7.5% in VO 2peak could be close to practically meaningful change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Similarly, the residuals in RPE were smaller for Δ15% ASR in comparison to 110% vVO 2max session without significantly different mean values. Although this difference in residuals did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.26), its practical meaningfulness should not be discounted even though reported TEs for RPE following HIIT sessions were 9.8% 27 . Namely, much lower TEs of 2.9% following speed endurance drills were also found in the literature 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean HR (HRmean, absolute and relatively to HRpeak) and time spent in the HR zone (expressed as % of the total time) for three intensity zones (<80%, 80-90%, and 90-100% of HRpeak) were determined individually for ISR, 3v3 and 6v6. Measures of reliability for the three experimental exercises were previously provided (Ravier, Hassenfratz, & Bouzigon, 2017). Based on test-retest analyses, the 3v3, ISR, and 6v6 demonstrated a high level of reproducibility for HRmean (correlation coefficient = 0.9, typical error of measurement = 2.2-2.6 bpm and coefficient of variation = 1.2-1.5%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%