2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200001)29:1<34::aid-ppul6>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of home spirometry in children with newly diagnosed asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Pelkonen et al reported 94% compliance with spirometric tests over a mean period of 24 days in newly diagnosed asthmatic children, but it is not reported whether this assessment was covert. 6 Our data (81.4% during the first 28 day period) are poorer than this. The children in our study were not newly diagnosed asthmatics, which perhaps reduced the novelty.…”
Section: Figure 2 Evect Of Reproducibility Criteria On Technical Qualcontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 Pelkonen et al reported 94% compliance with spirometric tests over a mean period of 24 days in newly diagnosed asthmatic children, but it is not reported whether this assessment was covert. 6 Our data (81.4% during the first 28 day period) are poorer than this. The children in our study were not newly diagnosed asthmatics, which perhaps reduced the novelty.…”
Section: Figure 2 Evect Of Reproducibility Criteria On Technical Qualcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…9 Other studies have reported excellent within session reproducibility 9 although, with a greater number of younger children, the proportion of successful manoeuvres may be lower than that observed in this study. 6 The DSS stores only the best manoeuvre and provides percentage variability in FVC + FEV 1 between the two best blows. This is the only measure of within session reproducibility.…”
Section: Figure 2 Evect Of Reproducibility Criteria On Technical Qualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a few paediatric studies with spirometry assessments performed at home [21,22]. WENSLEY and SILVERMAN [21] evaluated the ability of children aged 7-11 yrs to perform spirometry tests at home, without medical supervision [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a large variability in compliance, between 30 and 96%, with an average of 81% in the first month and 70% in the third month, indicating a significant reduction towards the end of the study. PELKONEN et al [22] demonstrated that children aged 5-10 yrs with a recent diagnosis of asthma were able to perform reproducible and valid spirometry tests at home. MORTIMER et al [23] demonstrated that portable spirometers could provide measurements that were highly comparable to those obtained from ''gold standard'' laboratory spirometers, and high-quality tracings could be achieved both at home and in the office setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%