1972
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1972.33.1.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of indirect (CO 2 ) Fick method for calculation of cardiac output.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…38 This combination has been found to give highly reproducible results (coecient of variation 5.7%) during submaximal exercise in healthy individuals. 20 The results are also in agreement with the results obtained by the direct Fick method 39 and the dye dilution method. 40 However, since only limited data is available for establishing the validity of indirect methods in able-bodied individuals, and no data is available in tetraplegic subjects, it is important to be aware of the assumptions and potential errors that may occur when using these techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…38 This combination has been found to give highly reproducible results (coecient of variation 5.7%) during submaximal exercise in healthy individuals. 20 The results are also in agreement with the results obtained by the direct Fick method 39 and the dye dilution method. 40 However, since only limited data is available for establishing the validity of indirect methods in able-bodied individuals, and no data is available in tetraplegic subjects, it is important to be aware of the assumptions and potential errors that may occur when using these techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In ambulatory individuals tested either on the treadmill or leg cycle ergometer, coefficients of variation for cardiac output measured with the rebreathing technique have been reported to range between 5 and 10 percent [6,[15][16]19], although one study observed coefficients of variation of 0.8 and 1.4 percent for workloads of 50 and 100 W, respectively [16]. Thus, the coefficient of variation we observed (5.1%) is typical of the values observed for ambulatory individuals using the CO 2 rebreathing technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most investigators have observed high day-to-day reproducibility of cardiac output measured by CO 2 rebreathing [13][14], and others have documented the procedure's validity by comparing it with cardiac output estimated from published regression lines relating to VO 2 [15][16]. However, few data are available on employing the CO 2 rebreathing technique in individuals with SCI, and to our knowledge no studies have assessed the reproducibility of this technique in an SCI population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability, reproducibility and validity of this method have already been reported by many researchers (KLAUSEN, 1965;FERGUSON et at., 1968;MUIESAN et at., 1968;ZEIDIFARD et at., 1972;WoLFE et at., 1978). An advantage of this method is that it gives hardly any discomfort to the subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to circulatory functions while exercising, it is known that the ° maximal heart rate is higher (ASTRAND and RODAHL, 1970;YOSHIDA and ISHIKO, 1977) and the maximal stroke volume and the maximal cardiac output are lower (YOSHIDA and ISHIKO, 1977) in children than in adults. However, no agreement has been obtained as to whether cardiac output (Q) in children during submaximal exercise is equal to (GODFREY et al, 1971;ZEIDIFARD et at., 1972) or lower (BAR-OR et al, 1971;ERICKSSON et al, 1971;RODE and SHEPHARD, 1973;PATERSON and CUNNINGHAM, 1976) than that in adults at a given oxygen uptake (Vo2). Moreover, many of these studies used values of adults in the literature for a comparison, which in fact should represent a less strict comparison.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%