1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80088-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of measurements of intima-media thickness and distensibility in the common carotid artery

Abstract: Our study demonstrates that reproducibility of measurements of IMT and arterial distensibility of the common carotid artery, by B-mode and M-mode ultrasonography respectively, is acceptable when used in large studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IMTmax is the normal approach in our department and has also been the reference parameter in some studies [20]. However, IMTmean (averaged three IMT measurements in the distal CCA centimeter) is recommended by the ASE for IMT manual quantification [9] and, as our results corroborate, less variable [15,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IMTmax is the normal approach in our department and has also been the reference parameter in some studies [20]. However, IMTmean (averaged three IMT measurements in the distal CCA centimeter) is recommended by the ASE for IMT manual quantification [9] and, as our results corroborate, less variable [15,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this scenario, the analysis of carotid US agreements becomes relevant. A number of previous papers have analyzed the reproducibility of manual and automatized carotid IMT measurements [5,11,12,14,20,21]. However, only a few made just a correlation analysis and agreement was not actually assessed [11,12,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The end-diastolic intima-media thickness (IMT) of the far wall of the middle segment of both common carotid arteries, defined by a simultaneous electrocardiographic recording, was measured 1 cm caudal to the bulb, as the distance between the lumen-intima interface and the media-adventitia interface. 13,14 Each measurement was calculated by taking the average of three readings. Intima-media thickening of the common carotid arteries was defined as an average IMT X0.9 mm.…”
Section: Carotid Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraobserver and interobserver coefficient of variability of IMT measurement is reported as being between 3% and 12%. 1,10,11 Whereas IMT measurement is an established surrogate parameter in epidemiologic studies, 6 -9 its role in clinical practice has to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%