2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of measures of neurophysiological activity in Wernicke's area: A magnetic source imaging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Posterior regions of the superior temporal gyrus are often included into a well known concept of the cortical organization of language processing known as Wernicke’s region (Boatman and Krauss, 2000, Bogen and Bogen, 1976, Harpaz et al, 2009, Luria, 1980, Simos et al, 2005). This is the brain region thought to engage in language-specific processing as it is well known historically that lesions in this region are capable of severely disrupting language comprehension; “Investigation of patients with a lesion of the posterior third of the first temporal gyrus of the left hemisphere and with sensory aphasia shows that, as a rule, they have no permanent hearing disturbance in the sphere of sounds not concerned with speech” (Luria, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior regions of the superior temporal gyrus are often included into a well known concept of the cortical organization of language processing known as Wernicke’s region (Boatman and Krauss, 2000, Bogen and Bogen, 1976, Harpaz et al, 2009, Luria, 1980, Simos et al, 2005). This is the brain region thought to engage in language-specific processing as it is well known historically that lesions in this region are capable of severely disrupting language comprehension; “Investigation of patients with a lesion of the posterior third of the first temporal gyrus of the left hemisphere and with sensory aphasia shows that, as a rule, they have no permanent hearing disturbance in the sphere of sounds not concerned with speech” (Luria, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following filtering, single-trial MEG event-related field segments (ERFs) in response to 110–125 stimulus presentations were averaged and brain activity sources were modeled as single equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) and fitted independently at successive 2 ms intervals (Sarvas, 1987; Papanicolaou et al, 2004; Simos et al, 2005) using the 4D-Neuroimaging proprietary software. The algorithm searched for the source most likely to have produced the observed magnetic field distribution at a given point in time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEG recordings were conducted using a 148‐channel magnetometer whole head system (Magnes 2500 WH; 4‐D Neuroimaging Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). Single equivalent current dipole (ECD) model was used in the analysis of language data and has been validated by other institutions (Papanicolaou et al., 1999; Simos et al., 2005). The methodology closely followed that described by Papanicolaou et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%