2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in rectal cancer.

Abstract: 715 Background: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a strong prognostic factor in many cancers. Recently, in Polish-2 study it was demonstrated to have a predictive value for hypofractionated neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer (WCGIC 2017). LMR > 2.6 was associated with significant improvement of overall survival after short-course radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) and consolidating chemotherapy when compared to chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.36). To our knowledge this is the first observation on use of a predictive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the first measurement was out of the range of approximately ±15% from the cut-off, the risk of misclassification in the second measurement dropped significantly, and in terms of the LMR, this dropped to 5% (95% CI, 1.0-13.9%), while for the NLR, it dropped to 8.3% (95% CI, 2.8-18.4%), and for the PLR, it dropped to 10% (95% CI, 3.8-20.5%). These results were in line with our previous retrospective study on the reproducibility of the LMR in patients with LARC, where two peripheral blood tests within five weeks prior to beginning anti-cancer therapies were performed [20]. The stability of the NLR over time, up to 100 days, has been demonstrated in cardiac surgery patients; however, it has not been confirmed in a cancer population [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if the first measurement was out of the range of approximately ±15% from the cut-off, the risk of misclassification in the second measurement dropped significantly, and in terms of the LMR, this dropped to 5% (95% CI, 1.0-13.9%), while for the NLR, it dropped to 8.3% (95% CI, 2.8-18.4%), and for the PLR, it dropped to 10% (95% CI, 3.8-20.5%). These results were in line with our previous retrospective study on the reproducibility of the LMR in patients with LARC, where two peripheral blood tests within five weeks prior to beginning anti-cancer therapies were performed [20]. The stability of the NLR over time, up to 100 days, has been demonstrated in cardiac surgery patients; however, it has not been confirmed in a cancer population [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The patients were divided in terms of the baseline values of their SIR markers into high and low LMR, NLR, and PLR groups. The cut-off values were determined based on our previous studies and the data available in the literature [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same percentage of patients (18%) as in the current study had not been re-assigned to the LMR group in the second test (95% CI, 8.6-31.4%). The chance for misclassi cation was 7.5% (95% CI, 1.6-20.4%) if LMR in the rst measurement was outside of the range of 2.2-3.0 compared to 5% (95% CI, 1.0-13.9%) in our current study [11]. The stability of NLR over time, up to 100 days, was demonstrated in cardiac surgery patients, it was not con rmed in cancer population, though [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Patients were divided in terms of baseline values of SIR markers into LMR,NLR,PLR-high and low groups. The cut-off values were determined based on our previous studies and data available in the literature [4,6,10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were divided in terms of pre-treatment values of SIR markers. The cut-off values were predetermined based on available data in the literature and our previous studies [4,6,8,9]. For LMR, the cut-off value was 2.6, for NLR 3.0 and for PLR 150.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%